Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RENNtech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 16:57, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RENNtech

Non-notable company. It's local to Lake Park, Florida, according to the web site. dbenbenn | talk 00:18, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as noted above. --KJPurscell 01:15, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; non-notable. Jaxl | talk 02:10, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep after rewrite. Jaxl | talk 02:35, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete but only because it's poorly executed. "local to x" means almost nothing with regard to notability. it could be a world-renowned local facility. and yes, pages aren't supposed to be deleted because they're poorly written. that's bunk, and one of the reasons so many horrible pages are created here. SaltyPig 02:31, 29 August 2005 (UTC) Keep, considering improvements. still needs work though. SaltyPig 00:18, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rewrite - notable and major automotive tuner - just because they're "local" (which means they only have one facility) doesn't mean their tuned Benzes aren't reviewed in every major car mag out there. 16,700 Googles. FCYTravis 08:20, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The company has been around for a while and their models haven been reviewed in a fair number of car magazines. Pilatus 11:38, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; non-notable. Dottore So 12:57, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable tuner, has been covered in major automotive press. Friday (talk) 18:10, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep field-leading company. — mendel ☎ 20:27, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
Keep seems notable in the world of gearboxes. Klonimus 21:42, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable company. Jachin 21:48, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I agree that notability doesn't require a huge amount of publiticy in the general press. I haven't personally verified the above claims, but I don't doubt them either... --Daedalus-Prime 23:47, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I've added links (found easily with a quick google) to support the assertions of being covered in major auto magazines. These guys aren't just your corner hotrod shop; they charge big money for their tuned Benzes, and the biggest magazines in the business have written about their products. If those who voted delete are still watching and would care to reconsider, I think we could safely remove this from VfD as being a definite keeper. Friday (talk) 00:06, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Coverage in major auto magazines. Andrew pmk | Talk 00:29, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.