Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RB Battles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:15, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RB Battles

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable per WP:GNG. A user-generated competition in Roblox is not an encyclopedic topic without significant secondary sourcing. That sourcing seems to mostly be ProGameGuides and a 'How To' article from Dexerto - see WP:GAMEGUIDE. Without evidence of secondary reliable reception this article seems likely to be ro-blocked from entering the mainspace. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:18, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:18, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment My mistake, sorry! I didn't know about Wikipedia:GNG, but I will note it. Mikeycdiamond (talk) 20:36, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clear fail of WP:GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:23, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I don't even think there is material here to merge towards the list article. λ NegativeMP1 17:31, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable subject, fails WP:GNG. Madeleine (talk) 03:07, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : As per nom. Fails WP:GNG. Gauravs 51 (talk) 13:11, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.