Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quick Blog
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus to delete. A merge could be done, I've added merge tags. W.marsh 01:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't very notable, and really is just wasting space. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. GreenJoe 05:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Go Daddy.--TBCΦtalk? 06:04, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per above. utcursch | talk 11:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there some ax you're trying to grind here, GreenJoe? I don't get why this is "wasting space." Look at another page in this category: ExpressionEngine How is that any more notable? I added the entry after adding Quick Blog to the list at MetaWeblog and I figured it would be nice to have an actual entry to suggest what Quick Blog was. I assumed that the red look of the other blog software in that list was an invitation to create entries. --Bbrown 13:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.