Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quest for the Code

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is certainly no consensus to delete. Suggestions to merge don't have consensus either, but can be pursued by interested editors on the article's talk page if they wish. Michig (talk) 07:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quest for the Code

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All references seems to be press releases , or incidental mentions--there are no references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources DGG ( talk ) 05:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:07, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Of the references already in the article, the Hollywood Reporter article[1] is a good one, as is the Univeristy of Syracuse PhD dissertation[2]. There also seems to have been significant academic interest in the topic. This is enough to convince me that WP:GNG is met. Lowercaserho (talk) 10:37, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Has enough references to be meet WP:GNG however cannot remain an article in its current state. Either Improve enough to Keep, Disambiguate or Draft the article until it becomes a passable article. Spy-cicle (talk) 18:19, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is an impressively-sourced article, with numerous RSes being dug up from the depths of obscurity. Phediuk (talk) 01:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep With that many famous people involved why would you not think it had ample coverage out there? Finding articles written back then online isn't as easy as things are now. Doesn't matter though, that many famous people worked together to create something, its notable, let it be by rules of common sense. Dream Focus 00:06, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Starlight Children's Foundation. Filled with puffery and advertisement-like language, it doesn't have any particular reason to be a standalone article._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 05:09, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - seems to pass WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 19:27, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Suggestion - as there is another health-related game up for deletion, Dbaza's Diabetes Education for Kids, perhaps a way forward would be to create a new article entitled something like Health Educational Games which could serve as a home for these and any other health related games - alternately, there is an article Games for Health which could be expanded to include games like Quest for the Code and Dbaza's Diabetes Education for Kids - Epinoia (talk) 02:39, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.