Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen Sized
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep as no one has given a reason to delete; I withdraw. Synergy 11:30, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Queen Sized (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Procedural nomination from MfD. I opt out, so no !vote. Synergy 11:56, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Addendum: Initial contributor has been blocked indef for sockpuppetry; this matters very little, yet I'd like mention that an attempt to notify was tried. Synergy 13:59, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- nowhere in that MFD discussion are any valid grounds for deletion cited. There are only grounds for editing. --S Marshall Talk/Cont 12:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I think a TV movie should be notable enough. The article gives too much of the plot away however, that should be changed. Borock (talk) 15:43, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- apears to have sourced citations to render it notable -- 62.25.109.196 (talk) 09:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Film with an IMDB page and some genuine working actors. I don't see the problem at all. bd2412 T 18:20, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. I originally nominated this for deletion, apparently in the wrong place. If nobody has seen it or can clean it up, I would change to Strong Delete.mitchsurp (talk) 10:26, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.