Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QBEX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:15, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

QBEX

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Ummm, I don't know where to start on describing this one! -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 09:01, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:00, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Procedural Keep~~ Comment - No rationale has been presented to delete. See also WP:DEL-REASON. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:42, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment From looking at the revision history and comparing the contents of this source to "aims and objectives" subsection it appears the article is basically a copy-paste job. Given several comments in edit summaries, it is likely a page that has been created by the members of the project and this shows plainly in the wording.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 13:52, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete QBEX has received no coverage in reliable sources. The references in the article relate to what the project is researching but not the project itself, and all of them predate this project. The standard Google News and Google Scholar searches yielded nothing of note. Goodvac (talk) 16:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:37, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:37, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - QBEX is an abbreviation for "Quantifying Benefits and impacts of fishing exclusion zones on bioresources around Marine Renewable Energy Installations". Haven't found significant coverage at this time. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:48, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.