Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyrassis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 00:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pyrassis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable fictional planet, no source is given. JL 09 ^_q?_{_c} 16:25, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:56, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
merge or redirect as appropriate, as with the others. Somehow, this process does not seem a good way to sort these out. DGG ( talk ) 20:31, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Agree with DGG; there is a process for an AfD on a group of related articles. AfDing each page is a pain in the lower-back region. Notwithstanding this the article, like the others, is an un-referenced fork of an un-referenced fork and as such notable material should be rolled back as appropriate (redirect, merge or delete, whatever works). I love Sci-Fi but I don't love fancruft.Simonm223 (talk) 21:50, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable fictional element that hasn't received any coverage. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 05:27, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.