Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pushpendra Nath Pathak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:44, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pushpendra Nath Pathak

Fails notability. Prod with concern "No service as an elected politician, appears only in list in sole reference, notabiliy not demonstrated" was removed by anonymous IP mass removing prods and it was blocked. Magioladitis (talk) 17:09, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:Notability (people), The reference linked mentions the name of this person once (in the crowd of 15 other names), but doesn't say anything about his notability. --The Firewall 20:28, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Has not served as a politician despite claim in article, no significant reference to sustain notability. WWGB (talk) 23:50, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He represented many posts in the past but we are unable to cross varify by net. we can demand to the article writer for varify the same. But if news is not available on net what is the alternate solution?. we need to think over it. Aminami (talk) 02:59, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Verifiability is one of Wikipedia's core content policies. Without relevant, independent references an article cannot remain. There is nothing to think over. WWGB (talk) 04:12, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. If there aren't any internet sources, are there any books, magazines, or journals that can be used as sources? These would also fulfill the requirements of WP:V. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 23:14, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- raven1977 (talk) 22:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- raven1977 (talk) 22:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Insufficient notability per Firewall and prod. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 23:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. General secretary of a district for youth wing of a party: that's not notable enough. --GDibyendu (talk) 05:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.