Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PureTnA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten (talk) 07:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PureTnA

Contested prod. Concern was: "Fails WP:WEB criteria; no independent sources to establish notability." I cannot find any coverage in reliable sources to indicate this site's notability. Suggest deletion per WP:WEB. Muchness (talk) 10:28, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete cannot find anything that meets WP:web. I will add that I cannot view the site due to internet restrictions, but Google searches (including PreTnA AND award) have come up with nothing. StephenBuxton (talk) 11:51, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
speedy delete as advertising/spam Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:47, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not blatant advertising, but the article fails WP:WEB. PeterSymonds | talk 13:28, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:43, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom NN Dreamspy (talk) 21:10, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what rock you live under, but PureTnA is known far and wide as a torrent mecca. If Time Magazine doesn't feature porn on it's cover, that doesn't make the site insignificant. At the very least, you need broad opinion before deleting something. Next someone will claim Jenna Haze isn't a celebrity because she's not on Radio Disney. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.144.236.133 (talk • contribs) 23:14, 19 April 2008
delete - not relevant, somewhat advertising --Mass147 (talk) 01:08, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.