Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pump It Up Contents Creation Contest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 07:50, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pump It Up Contents Creation Contest

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Event lacks widespread coverage from reliable secondary sources. All entries that come up after running a simple Google search appears to be limited to social media related sites. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 06:47, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This work-in-process article is also based on the main Pump It Up's home page as I, the creator of the article, have cited references so it will not be too reliable on social media websites like Facebook. Also, the song and character database concerning Andamiro's annual event should be treasured here on Wikipedia other than different sites like Fandom site so that it will attract attention towards players who have voted and/or followed the participants. TargonRedDragon(talk) 15:22, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing in WP:VGRS. --Izno (talk) 16:34, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Lack of significant coverage independent of the subject in reliable sources. Doesn't really look like there's much worth merging, either. Red Phoenix ^talk 21:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:09, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Most likely WP:FANCRUFT. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 00:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for being fancruft and non-notable. Namcokid 47 ^(Contribs) 03:32, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.