Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puffle (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Club Penguin. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 00:43, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Puffle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, mostly because I don't what the article is about Fuddle (talk) 23:24, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - re-direct to Club Penguin.Eustachiusz (talk) 23:55, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect That's not really a valid reason for deletion but redirect to Club Penguin is sufficient JayJay^{What did I do?} 01:02, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect And salt? Original AFD shouldn't have been keep in my view, but I guess those were different days. Nothing appears to have changed since the deletion from the 2nd AFD. -- ferret (talk) 01:06, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Club Penguin as a useful redirect term. No signs of independent notability for "puffles" to justify having a separate page. – czar 06:21, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.