Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pudding (Space Channel 5 character)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus leans heavily toward delete with the sole keep agreeing the character is not notable enough. Deserving of a link on Pudding (dab) is not a reason to keep. While there is some minor consideration for re-direction, this is not a likely search term due to the name. TravellingCari 01:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pudding (Space Channel 5 character)

This character does not assert notability outside of the its video game appearances. It is unlikely that any third party sources will ever talk about it outside of the context of the games, so it has no reason to exist. TTN (talk) 12:47, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. TTN (talk) 12:51, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, bit character about which very little can be said that isn't basically a transcript from the games. Nifboy (talk) 16:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nn character --T-rex 18:04, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. JuJube (talk) 22:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Or Redirect because there is too much info in the first and second paragraph. Ether delete it or if there is a list of Space Channel 5 characters article, put all the info there.--TONO459 (talk) 10:54, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom note regarding lack of RWC. RWC is needed for an article to have staying power. ThuranX (talk) 21:40, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and redirect - The character is not notable enough to merit its own article, but it at least deserves a link on Pudding (disambiguation). This article should be redirected to Space Channel 5. Neelix (talk) 22:38, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No real world context. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:37, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.