Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proxy based assertion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proxy based assertion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:GNG. This was a straight paste of an OWASP article by its author, referenced only by the author's own writing on the subject. I can find no other mention of the technique online. I've cleaned it up a bit, but the whole article is WP:Original research, and mostly an unreferenced bulleted list.

OnionRing (talk) 10:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 10:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 10:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's because it's the first write-up on the subject. feel free to remove the page if you wish. Ekalman (talk) 10:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Please note that once the technique becomes widely used, an article should certainly be written on it. OnionRing (talk) 11:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unreferenced, does not meet notability guideline. DeVerm (talk) 21:41, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Does not meet WP:N at all, and the author has stated herein that the concept is essentially WP:MADEUP. This is pretty much confirmed upon viewing the sources used in the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:27, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I found zero sources. Maybe even speedy delete per WP:G7, though I am not sure the comment above amounts to a "request" of deletion. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 13:24, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.