Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Lore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to World of Warcraft. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 00:31, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Project Lore

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unencyclopedia non-notable website created by one of the website staff Wirbelwindヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 18:15, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —Wirbelwindヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 18:15, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Google search reveals several articles from major technology sites/blogs on this topic. Joshdboz (talk) 22:12, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:00, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 20:58, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: RElisted as there has being no discussion since the first relist. Last relist. --JForget 21:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

weak delete, the reliable sources I've found don't really seem to be in depth coverage, focusing mainly on the creator. Thryduulf (talk) 09:38, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 09:38, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 09:38, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with World of Warcraft. While the CNN link is compelling as far as notability goes, and millions of users of WoW may find this site useful, this article starts off well for the first paragraph, then goes into self-promotional and otherwise why-do-I-care detail about its videos, rather than the site itself. Not a WoW player, but if I were, I'd want to know about this site--but I'd hardly look for it by name on Wikipedia. I think the first paragraph, with an external link, belongs under the Community tab in the WoW article. SithToby (talk) 21:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - I have to agree with SithToby - one, and only one, item of coverage usually indicates the subject is more suitable for inclusion in a broader topic (Wikipedia:N#cite_note-3). Perhaps World of Warcraft#In other media; a short paragraph will suffice. Marasmusine (talk) 10:18, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Here's one from Massively.com (a "situational" source according to WP:VG/RS). There's also one from TechCrunch which was later picked up by The Washington Post. The rest are mostly press releases as far as I can tell. SharkD (talk) 02:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well found, but they both seem a bit press-releasey to me. Marasmusine (talk) 15:03, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, it is unlikely to be included in the article World of Warcraft due to notability, thus redirecting to it would not be beneficial. I say redirect, because there are already several fan projects which redirect to that article after having AfD's closed as merge with no mention of them in the target. --Taelus (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.