Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Dawnstar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus is clear: promotional and not notable DGG ( talk ) 01:58, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Project Dawnstar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to evidence notability. No non-primary sources given, from what I've found, there is no coverage in newspapers/respected websites. Just seems to be an April Fool's day promotion. Seattle (talk) 00:44, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:50, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:50, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - If good secondary sources are found, it should be added to the main Expedia article. --Rhododendrites (talk) 01:35, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is viral marketing, not a hoax. Too promotional and far too non-notable for Wikipedia. If it belongs anywhere at all, it belongs in the Expedia article, where it can get a one-sentence summary. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:32, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.