Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Amad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. —C.Fred (talk) 00:42, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Project Amad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Random accusation from Israeli PM, better as a single line (some day a whole paragraph) at Iran and weapons of mass destruction LaserLegs (talk) 21:43, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 April 30. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - not so fast. Accusation is supported by evidence and literally thousands of documents. It was reported by newspapers and reliable sources across the world. Trump just said Netanyahu proved him right. Let's wait for more information on the news instead of rushing to delete this article.--יניב הורון (talk) 21:50, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I don't think whether if the claim is legitimate or not is the largest concern. Since it has impacted Trump's decision-making on an important deal, one can argue this accusation has lasting significance.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 22:35, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as יניב הורון and GracefulSlick say.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per יניב הורון.Nanophosis (talk) 23:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As something literally supported by thousands of documents, and that it's been noted to affect real word decision making as we speak (Trump on the nuke deal), simply deleting this because Mossad delivered it would be absurd. Thelovelyconch (talk) 23:35, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sheer volume of support and the facts and consequences of this clearly pass WP:GNG - Galatz ^Talk 23:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - If the story dies, it can always be merged into another article. Presently, however, the story has legitimate RSs and considerable traction. The Kingfisher (talk) 00:33, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn' whatever then. This should never have been it's own article, Iran and weapons of mass destruction is where this latest poorly substantiated factoid from a hyper-antagonistic source belongs, but the opinion is clearly against me, so keep it, whatever. Just someone please put it in Category:This POV battle ground article is doomed to forever be a stub filled POV enforcing tidbits for dubious reliable sources. Sorry I brought it up. --LaserLegs (talk) 00:39, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.