Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Profectus theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Profectus theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable term, with zero relevant ghits that I can find (see also discussion on Talk page). None of the references used in the article mention the term, either. Some of the content might be salvageable for the human overpopulation article, so CSD may not be appropriate, but the term itself seems to be made up. Anaxial (talk) 08:40, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:52, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.