Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Private library of the Niavaran Complex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Niavaran Complex. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:11, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Private library of the Niavaran Complex

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only source listed for the article is a dead link which hasn't worked for years. It is a private library within a complex whose overarching notability is marginal at best. Initial google searches show little to no independent coverage of the library amongst any sources. Flip^and Flopped ツ 15:42, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:57, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

merge to Niavaran Complex, presuming the sourcing issue can be dealt with. The main article is short and can easily absorb this, and there's not the slightest claim to independent notability. Seyasirt (talk) 16:54, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:00, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:00, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Niavaran Complex. desmay (talk) 14:31, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per rationals above. Sadads (talk) 16:34, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge though a proper search, even in English, show there are a number of mentions such as this one. Obviously "Niavaran library" is the best term to start searching with. Poor WP:BEFORE! Johnbod (talk) 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.