Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princeton Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 06:32, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Princeton Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

almost every reference is to their own publications; the others seem to be press releases or mentions DGG ( talk ) 06:50, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - all of the sources in the article are primary - either the company's own website or from a vendor conference it participated in. My own searches didn't turn up anything in RS but a few trivial mentions. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not appear to meet WP:CORP. The article's references are all primary, except for one from Facebook and one that doesn't mention the company. --MelanieN (talk) 21:44, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.