Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prime Database

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:07, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prime Database

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable as corp. Promotional language. SPA creator and possible COI. GregJackP Boomer! 03:26, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 21. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:36, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete So promotional, fails WP:PROMO. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:08, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:18, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:18, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:24, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because there aren't any solidly good sources about this company with both News and Books finding results but nothing significant as it's mostly data results from their studies along with Highbeam giving results. Until they receive some better attention, there's not much for an article. SwisterTwister talk 14:50, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.