Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premjith Rayaroth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 23:05, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Premjith Rayaroth

Fails our general notability guideline and WP:BIO. The article about him in the Hindu isn't the in-depth coverage of him needed for an encyclopedic article, and as this one event is the only thing he could be notable for I believe he would qualifie as a WP:BLP1E. Them From Space 20:29, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:07, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the article from that list - he's not that sort of architect. --Joopercoopers (talk) 12:35, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 01:27, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 01:29, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable - better to include him in an article mention of whatever fantastic innovation he's reputed to have invented......but then that seems fairly unimpressive as well to my non-IT centred mind, but perhaps might have a better chance of surviving AfD. Really, let's prove the innovation is notable first, and then worry about the author- delete for now. --Joopercoopers (talk) 12:35, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Aside from the one piece in The Hindu co-published in the Frontline, I haven't been able to find anything else, also unable to verify the name of the app server he developed, so clearly fails WP:V, and given that this was done in 2002, and there's no mention since then, it's likely not notable. -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 00:09, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per User:SpacemanSpiff. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:45, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.