Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Predictions for human evolution
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:42, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Predictions for human evolution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Firstly, the title is misleading (it should be something like "predictions on future technological advances"). But renaming would be senseless, as this article is totally useless. Currently, it only hold four entries. Someone included sort of a disclaimer, ruling out topics that should not be included. The whole content is pure speculation, which might much better suit in the article covering the technological subject. Such a list tends to be never-ending, surely it is not desirable to have any prediction listed here which some sort of "expert" might once have stated. Therefore, this article's encyclopedic relevance tends to be zero. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 17:39, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There is no sign that this is headed toward covering an encyclopaedic topic in an encyclopaedic way; in fact, there is no sign of much activity at all. We gave it a chance but it has stalled on the road to nowhere. Time to get rid of it. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:48, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:LIST. It is weird, disjointed, and random. Bearian (talk) 20:17, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Bearian. --MelanieN (talk) 15:31, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.