Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Chennithala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prakash Chennithala

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Brief mentions in sources but couldn't find anything to show subject meets WP:BIO NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Reads like self-promo. A lot of flowery and purple prose. Perhaps the organization, Human Rights Protection Mission, deserves a Wikipedia article, but the individual's role in the company does not. --FuzzyGopher (talk) 21:56, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A WP:SPA autobiography referenced only to brief coverage of a press release issued by the subject. The tailored Indian search finds an in-role quote in a short piece from The Hindu [1] which at least provides basic verification of the subject's organisational position, but does not establish notability. Fails WP:BASIC, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 09:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There are only few passing mentions. Subject fails basic and gng. It also reads promotional. Anup [Talk] 14:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nom.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 08:57, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.