Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prager University

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear agreement that the subject is unable to support its own article. The content is poorly sourced and mostly comprised of fluff writing, so keeping it undeleted for the sake of a later content merge seems impractical. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:45, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prager University

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the name, this organization is not a university; it does not even appear to offer what is normally considered educational coursework. Rather, it is the name for a collective series of video releases, headed by a radio host, Dennis Prager. That isn't to say that such an organization cannot be notable, but I cannot seem to find anything in the form of a reliable source that would help this meet our notability and WP:CORP thresholds. Some hits that initially look like promising review sites, e.g. College Insurrection, but it is unfortunately not much more than a blog that publishes user-submitted "articles". Tarc (talk) 01:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:13, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:14, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect Make the content into a section on his page. The RS citations are kind of borderline—sites like the Daily Caller and pro-Israel groups like StandWithUs. --Jprg1966 ^(talk) 04:06, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect if any of the content is usable. As it stands, the article has just six references. Four are to the group's own website, one to the IMDB, and one, to the sole arguably reliable source, treats the entire project as a joke. This deserves at best one or two sentences on the article about Dennis Prager. RolandR (talk) 18:10, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Said "sole arguably RS" is actually a blog, so even the "one or two sentences" option is dubious, at best. This verges on WP:CSD#G11. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:09, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.