Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pradeep Roopun

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. As the President of Mauritius, the subject clearly meets WP:NPOL. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:52, 8 December 2019 (UTC) (Undoing and reclosing a previous unsigned closure.)[reply]

Pradeep Roopun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Andrew Base (talk) 13:51, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Andrew Base (talk) 13:51, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Meets WP:NPOL - he's the current President of Mauritius and has previously held two Ministerial offices in the country's government. Neiltonks (talk) 16:02, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The article obviously needs some improvement, but the president of an independent country is inherently notable even if the article isn't FA-quality yet. Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not necessarily the quality of the article in its current state — which means that if good sources exist to improve the article with, which they certainly do here if you do a simple Google News search, then we keep the article and allow it to improve rather than deleting it just for not already being in better condition than it is. Bearcat (talk) 16:46, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.