Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power Continuity
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 05:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Power Continuity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Although phrased like an (appallingly written) advert, this doesn't appear to be advertising any particular company or product, and so doesn't fall under G11. However, it does appear largely redundant to the various articles it links to, such as Uninterruptible power supply, Generator and Static Transfer Switch. It's also effectively an unsourced essay, laden with original research. Yunshui 雲水 13:10, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing new. Nothing notable. Nothing sourced. That it reads like something translated into a foreign language by a computer program and then back into English is just the icing. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 15:49, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Reads like a brochure; no citations--E8 (talk) 03:03, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. — ΛΧΣ21™ 04:10, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.