Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power 50

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted as an article that had been proposed for deletion without challenge for seven days. Skomorokh, barbarian 02:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Power 50

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear-cut spam for local newspaper supplement, created by COI editor. Orange Mike | Talk 22:26, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Birmingham Post after significant rewrite to resolve copyright issues. The subject is not notable enough for its own article but warrants inclusion into its parent article. Snottywong (talk) 23:33, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Stub and merge — Do away with most of it per WP:COPYVIO and WP:NOTWEBHOST. The Post has its own website; let them go use it. Short mention in the Wikipedia article Birmingham Post might be appropriate only if local notability is established by WP:Reliable sources not in conflict of interest with the authors/producers of the list. Otherwise, away with all of it. --Closeapple (talk) 09:07, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright/Merge Understood there may be copyright issues, which seems like Post and Future have shared ownership. However, information itself is accurate and neutral so suggest a merge with Post page? --Nchiang01 (talk) 11:12, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.