Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-hipster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 14:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Post-hipster

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough reliable sources to establish notability of this neologism. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nothing here that can't easily be covered in hipster. I also like the completely unexplained photo. Shadowjams (talk) 22:05, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Hipster (contemporary subculture). The nom should have opened a merger discussion, not AfD. --Reference Desker (talk) 13:12, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The creator should have... the nom's just the messenger. Shadowjams (talk) 09:36, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - yet another AFD for something that could have just been redirected with a note on the talk page. Bob talk 08:01, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable neologism verging on a hoax, in my opinion. And who is the dude in the picture? Carrite (talk) 02:15, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:56, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:57, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.