Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Positive science
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Positivism. Wifione Message 08:45, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Positive science (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is failing WP:DICTIONARY. Content could possibly belong to the article of Descriptive science. However, there is nothing else than a dictionary-like definition. Previously proposed to be deleted by @Loodog: on the article's talk page in June 2011. Ceosad (talk) 01:04, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to positivism, which treats the same subject in more depth and breadth. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:46, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:07, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:07, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to positivism as per Qwertyus.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:04, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.