Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Positive Internet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Positive Internet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:45, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable and noteworthy accomplishments. — Cirt (talk) 14:38, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment anyone got a copy of the Guinness Book of Records that has them? Because that's the only notable issue I see. Neonchameleon (talk) 17:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: WP:Promotional BlitzGreg (talk) 10:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability is not inherited from having hosted the record-setting show. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I found some passing mentions including facilitating podcast download record.[1][2][3] Although only passing mentions, the rather generic name complicates the search for sources. It'd be helpful to have sources stating numbers of employees, etc. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 13:57, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Trivial awards, no substantial coverage, no apparent importance now or earlier. DGG ( talk ) 16:12, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.