Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Popgoth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:58, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Popgoth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable "movement" by non-notable artist. Does not meet WP:GNG. Tried to ProD, but author reverted without making changes. ubiquity (talk) 18:35, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no sources to show notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:27, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unsourced; something someone made up one day. A google search reveals nothing but deviantart and flickr pages. Interestingly, a book called PopGoth: The Gothic in Contemporary Popular Culture appears to exist from 2012 but it's impossible at this time to verify if it has anything to do with this so-called movement. A search only reveals a different book citing this one. I'm assuming the title is a coincidence, as the title indicated that it is about popular culture, not an art movement. freshacconci talk to me 18:21, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.