Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PopText (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:39, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PopText

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant coverage in independent sources, with just a brief mention in a BBC article and a short paragraph in this Sunday Times list. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:40, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:40, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:40, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the references in the article are minor mentions. I can find no significant coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 02:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom lacks significant coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:58, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.