Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poor Ana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:05, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Poor Ana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any sources with more than a passing mention of this book, so it doesn't look it passes criterion one of WP:NBOOK. I do see that it is the subject of study in many language arts classes in the United States, but it is usually used more like a textbook than a novel, and was written specifically for use in education, so does not pass WP:NBOOK criterion number four. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 23:51, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to nominate Casi se muere, which is from the same series of language education books as Poor Ana, and seems to have the same problems with notability. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 23:55, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I wasn't able to find any independent and reliable sources to show notability at all. Delete per reasons voiced by Stradivarius.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:21, 22 February 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
Delete per nom. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 04:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.