Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pond5
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:22, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Pond5 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Disputed PROD. Reason was "While notability is asserted it is not verified" Fiddle Faddle 12:24, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, | Uncle Milty | talk | 01:56, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep While the sources don't discuss it in great detail, there appear to be a fair number of reliable sources mentioning it. Nwlaw63 (talk) 02:28, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.