Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pomarj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Flanaess. As this is the third AFD I closed as such, I want to remind the nominator that WP:ATD-M can be followed without having to nominate an article for deletion. So Why 06:52, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pomarj

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic does not establish notability. TTN (talk) 12:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 12:04, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to Flanaess. BOZ (talk) 13:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or delete, unless third-party sources are forthcoming. Josh Milburn (talk) 16:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Flanaess. This is just a more specific page on a more broad topic that I think is notable, so I don't see why I should favor deletion over merging. Borderlandor (talk) 20:39, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per BOZ and WP:ATD-M. Jclemens (talk) 05:01, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Flanaess. The article is filled with fictional trivia. Power~enwiki (talk) 21:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.