Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polcompballs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:53, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Polcompballs

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable art style with no sources besides random social media posts. Gabe114 (talk) 13:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Visual arts. Gabe114 (talk) 13:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I cannot find any evidence to verify it exists outside their own fora. Star Mississippi 14:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (edit conflict) No evidence of notability. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 14:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Iseult^Δxparlez moi 14:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I did all the usual searches and am not even convinced this is a thing, never mind notable. CT55555 (talk) 18:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.