Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Podhammer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 01:08, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Podhammer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet notability criteria at WP:GNG, WP:WEB or WP:ORG Dubbin^u | t 19:02, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would be candidate for WP:PROD but was nominated in July 2010. I can't see that it meets notability criteria now. Dubbin^u | t 19:12, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:25, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:24, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 09:09, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I can't find any coverage in reliable sources, fails WP:GNG. Quasi human | Talk 14:17, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and at this point I'd treat this as an uncontested proposed deletion. Article is about an Australian-based Podcast that discusses Games Workshop's miniature wargame Warhammer Fantasy Battles. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree as the proposer. It was only the previous WP:PROD, rescinded without explanation, that held me back from going down that route. I think the tumbleweed blowing round here is testament to the subject's lack of notability. Dubbin^u | t 02:57, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.