Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pocket computer phone
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Smartphone. v/r - TP 03:06, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Pocket computer phone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:N and WP:NOR. No sources use this term, and despite an assertion to the contrary on the talk page, this article duplicates smartphone. Pnm (talk) 00:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed. The wikilinks of the various devices within are described as smartphones in their own pages. For deletion. Stardrifter1984 (talk) 00:33, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Smartphone. Disclosure: this edit made on a Droid X. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:06, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Smartphone per WP:COMMONNAME. Msnicki (talk) 18:41, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Delete. Pnm makes a great point, below. It is WP:MADEUP and there isn't any reason to bother with a redirect. We should delete. Msnicki (talk) 16:08, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Cullen. --Legis (talk - contribs) 04:38, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Why redirect, rather than delete, this random, made-up phrase which no sources use? – Pnm (talk) 15:29, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Smartphone. I don't like to rely on Google counts, but searching "Pocket computer phone" gives 95900 hits. So it seems that this term may be in use in different parts of the world. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 00:12, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.