Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pika parser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pika parser

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to fail WP:NOR. The article is more or less entirely based on a recent arXiv preprint that has not been peer-reviewed, and there exist no reliable sources on the article's main subject, which is itself first proposed in the aforementioned arXiv preprint. Looking at the edit history of this article's primary author, it seems likely that they are also the author of the arXiv preprint, who has no prior history of work on programming language research. 2601:19B:701:6980:715C:5417:4D8F:2B7D (talk) 17:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP nominator. Above text is copied from article talk page. I have no opinion of my own at this time. --Finngall ^talk 18:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The quality of the references is not enough Charmk (talk) 04:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.