Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pi Network

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. RL0919 (talk) 12:19, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pi Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. ––FormalDude (talk) 09:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

89.137.109.34 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. - Cabayi (talk) 13:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It should remain cause sooner or later this network will most likely grows bigger and popular. It is WP:Relevant. What it needs, is rephrasing and copyediting. 182.183.0.254 (talk) 13:09, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At this moment this network is not notable enough to have an article we can not assume that it would do something •Cyberwolf• 15:35, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Cyberwolf. I see your point, but given its user base of more than 100 million, with 50 million actively engaged as Pioneers, It is quite noteworthy.
Here is my draft for the article:
I hope other can improve it further. 182.183.0.254 (talk) 09:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would also delete this because most of the sources used are Linked In, forex websites, and crypto websites such as changeally and BSC news. The author purposefully ignored these non-crypto sources: Pi Network under investigation for fraud in Vietnam and this website JJPTR founder Johnson Lee announces a new "pi coin" money-making scheme. and JJPTR创办人李宗圣疑重出江湖 跑透全马宣传虚拟货币交易 (use google translate). Cerevisae (talk) 11:45, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think then we can add the above mentioned info in the "Controversy" or "Legal Issues" section. 182.183.0.254 (talk) 13:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Promotional and spam and only sources are crypto or forex Isla 🏳️‍⚧ 11:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. It should remain as it has been mentioned by independent newspaper: The Stanford Daily, American business website: Forbes, media property: Yahoo! Finance as well as by financial company The Motley Fool and other sites like Analytics Insight.
The proposed draft above is also written in a WP:Neutral and non-promotional manner. 182.183.0.254 (talk) 11:44, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Even Filecoin and Zcash and Litecoin have their own dedicated articles. 182.183.0.254 (talk) 11:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.