Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Photon Engineering

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fred Optical Engineering Software. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades^Godric 17:10, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photon Engineering

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any independent reliable sources that would suggest this company is notable. While their software might be, the notability of the organisation is not inherited. Sam Walton (talk) 09:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:50, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Fred Optical Engineering Software. The refs on the current article are not enough to even approach clearing WP:GNG and I cannot find significant coverage beyond bare mentions in articles about the FRED software.. David in DC (talk) 19:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 02:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as above. The company appears to inherit notability by being the author of the FRED software. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 10:38, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.