Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phibs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phibs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think he meets WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 10:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - there are enough independent verifiable sources to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. His artworks have been acquired by the National Gallery of Australia. The article does need further work to meet encyclopaedic standards. Will work on it over the next 48hrs. - DONE Dan arndt (talk) 03:16, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw nomination convinced by Dan's fantastic work. Boleyn (talk) 08:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.