Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Mars
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 17:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Peter Mars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable artist. Recreated deleted material, COI. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 22:02, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Letsdrinktea (talk) 22:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I agree the article needs to be rewritten, but the subject and his art have been written up in multiple newspapers, which would appear to meet the GNG. Karanacs (talk) 15:52, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:01, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and stop wasting time. He is a well known American pop artist. The article is rather crappy, reads like a publicity hound press release, but, shit, how many newspapers does he have to be mentioned in? He's a known American pop artist according to his article on Wikipedia. --KP Botany (talk) 08:33, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Clearly meets the notabilty guideline - the article just needs to be slightly rewritten fuzzy510 (talk) 22:42, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Slighty? But, yes, you're correct, notability is not an issue. --KP Botany (talk) 01:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This article needs a major re-write. Its a pity the fuzzy image of him can't be deleted though. --Artene50 (talk) 01:27, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think "major rewrite" is a bit more accurate. We should ask the artist to release a better picture. --KP Botany (talk) 01:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.