Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pet Smart
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 September 3. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW, and based on the creator's other edits, looks to be part of a walled garden of blatantly non-notable self-promotion. Recreating as redirect to PetSmart. --Kinu t/c 20:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Pet Smart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Book never published, WP:MADEUP. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:58, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:59, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can find no sources that suggest this book satisfies WP:NBOOK. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 19:02, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Forget looking for sources, the article makes no credible claim of anything that remotely approaches NBOOK. Jclemens (talk) 19:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: the author's article is currently a CSD candidate as A3 and A7. The relevant category has already been deleted as G6. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:24, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete, no notability whatsoever. WP:SNOW applies. --Kinu t/c 19:47, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, and after deleting this self-promotion from the history, might as well recreate as a redirect to PetSmart. Google thinks it's a plausible typo, so it's probably a plausible redirect. --Kinu t/c 19:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Good idea. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 19:55, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, and after deleting this self-promotion from the history, might as well recreate as a redirect to PetSmart. Google thinks it's a plausible typo, so it's probably a plausible redirect. --Kinu t/c 19:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.