Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peru–Ukraine relations
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nja247 18:37, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Peru–Ukraine relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Another one of those X-Y country relations articles that doesn't seem to satisfy WP:N. tempodivalse [☎] 13:38, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a collection of articles on miscellaneous juxtapositions of countries, nor a directory of which do or do not exchange diplomats. Fails notability as well. Edison (talk) 15:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - random pairing of two countries on opposite sides of the world; no evidence of notability. - Biruitorul Talk 16:28, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. -- Jmundo 17:08, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, the article shares knowledge = that what's wikipedia is all about! — Mariah-Yulia (talk) 20:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- As established by numerous discussions, bilateral relations are not inherently notable. You need independent sources to verify that. - Biruitorul Talk 03:52, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Once again, a randomly created article that does nothing to assert notability in world affairs, and is not likely to be able to. --BlueSquadronRaven 16:00, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia Dialogue 10:50, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia Dialogue 10:50, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete a non notable relationship. I only found this article of 2006 which demonstrates the vagueness of relations. http://en.for-ua.com/news/2006/12/26/170003.html nothing else like trade etc LibStar (talk) 04:00, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This article consists exclusively of the kind of information that may or may not be mentioned in passing, to give depth to an existing article. There is no indication that the subject of this article (the relations between the two states) passes WP:N, and no technical reason to put the information here rather than into more reasonable places. --Hans Adler (talk) 01:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.