Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Personal development planning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus defaulting to keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. One keep + the OP's delete. Article has been relisted w/o further comment. It's time to move on. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personal development planning

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable topic on its own. If included at all it would be as part of the Personal Development article. NerudaPoet (talk) 20:54, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 16. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:13, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a highly notable topic as there seem to be many books devoted to it. The nomination is therefore false and it also seems to suggesting merger not deletion. Andrew D. (talk) 14:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:07, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.