Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perez Benjamin
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn by nominator. Bearcat (talk) 17:56, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw per that I was unaware that you need to a Google Books search before throwing down the AfD. Lesson learned let's close this down before anyone else has their time cut down. MM (Report findings) (Past espionage) 15:34, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Perez Benjamin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails the '2 sources' rule, a search on Google isn't turning anything up either. MM (Report findings) (Past espionage) 09:47, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- NOTICE: if 3 sources that fit the rules are added notify me and i'll Withdraw. MM (Report findings) (Past espionage) 09:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. czar · · 10:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. czar · · 10:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Member of a national legislature, so meets the criteria of WP:POLITICIAN. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:58, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nova Scotia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Nominator has failed to do a Google Books search, which easily demonstrates the availability of multiple sources verifying notability under the SNG. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- NPA yes? Is there a policy that states that a Books search needs to be done? MM (Report findings) (Past espionage) 09:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- NPA no. From WP:AFD: The minimum search expected is a Google Books search and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects. Such searches should in most cases take only a minute or two to perform. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 11:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- When I mentioned 'NPA yes?' I meant 'You are being sure not to break NPA Yes?' I must have missed that when I was learning about AfD. My mistake. MM (Report findings) (Past espionage) 15:32, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- NPA no. From WP:AFD: The minimum search expected is a Google Books search and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects. Such searches should in most cases take only a minute or two to perform. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 11:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- NPA yes? Is there a policy that states that a Books search needs to be done? MM (Report findings) (Past espionage) 09:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.