Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penvellyn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Curse_of_Blackmoor_Manor#The_Penvellyn_legacy. Salvidrim! ✉ 19:50, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Penvellyn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-Notable and based as a background off one game in a larger series Delete/Speedy Delete Jamesbuc (talk) 12:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 10. Snotbot t • c » 13:03, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Possible redirect to Curse_of_Blackmoor_Manor#The_Penvellyn_legacy - It seems this family is important to the game's story but because it is only relevant to this game and there wouldn't be much else to add to the article, redirecting may be appropriate. A Google News search provided several news articles for Curse of Lackmoor Manor which I plan to add to the game's own article. SwisterTwister talk 20:41, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The problem is that some of this is more of a walkthrough than any actual information. For example it openly reveals the culprit and reads more like a fanpage. Moving it would basically be more excessive synopsis when wiki isnt really a place for that. See WP:DISCRIMINATE Jamesbuc (talk) 21:52, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 00:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 00:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 15:51, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect To Curse of Blackmoor Manor as a plausible search term. I do agree that there's nothing there that merits a standalone article. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:46, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.