Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peng's Coefficient

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:31, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peng's Coefficient

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like either a hoax or something someone made up one day. No sources since 2013 and nothing found. If this were newer I would have just tagged for CSD. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 18:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 18:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I cannot find reference to it literally anywhere on the internet other than some weird translation websites that are offering a translation of the term because there's a wikipedia article for it. I also cannot find really anything about Engel's Constant, the constant of which this is claimed to be an inverse. snood1205^{(Say Hi! (talk))} 18:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as something made up one day. See Engel's law for the coefficient that is actually used. XOR'easter (talk) 23:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and recommend that closing admin list this on WP:HOAXLIST wizzito | say hello! 06:45, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.