Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pendemonium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:34, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pendemonium

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks substantial coverage in RSs. Tagged for notability for nearly 1 year. Epeefleche (talk) 17:10, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unsourced article lacks notability. Web searches return mostly mirrors of this article. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 17:46, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Can't find significant coverage of the series in my searching. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:16, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Hobbes Goodyear's findings. Also Redirect resulting page to Pandemonium as a plausible mispelling.--Lenticel ^(talk) 13:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to Pandemonium as a plausible mispelling. I can't find any significant coverage for this, though I did learn a lot about an antique fountain pen shop in Iowa named "Pendemonium" that may have the sources for an article. Rangoondispenser (talk) 19:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.